Neutron Skins: Weak Elastic Scattering and Neutron Stars
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recently completed PREX-2 campaign measured the density distribution of neutrons in the lead nucleus as a function of momentum transfer (the form factor), confirmed a relatively large extent of the neutrons beyond the protons in the nucleus (the neutron skin), and provided a precise determination of the density of protons and neutrons at the center of a heavy nucleus. In turn, the measured form factor can be related to various nuclear and neutron star properties. The NICER X-ray telescope has inferred the masses and radii of some X-ray pulsars (neutron stars), although complications arise when determining these quantities independently. Further improvements in NICER have enabled simultaneous mass–radius determinations that had not previously been possible. During the next decade, measurements in astrophysics, gravitational-wave astronomy, and nuclear physics are expected to provide a wealth of more precise data. In this review, we present an overview of the current state of neutron skin measurements and offer insights into prospects for the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it