A Survey of Industrial AIoT: Opportunities, Challenges, and Directions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) is an important technology employed in a variety of different applications, such as transportation, healthcare, and manufacturing. In recent years, the number of IoT devices deployed globally has been increasing at a rapid pace and is estimated to reach 20 billion by the end of 2025. In modern industry, IoT plays a pivotal role by monitoring the condition of industrial machines and, consequently, improving the efficiency of industrial processes. To optimize the efficiency of industrial IoT applications, various Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques have been adopted, leading to a new computing paradigm, namely, Industrial Artificial Intelligence of Things (i.e. Industrial AIoT). In this paper, we describe the challenges to tackle and the opportunities to explore in Industrial AIoT. Specifically, we first review the use of state-of-the-art AI methods in Industrial AIoT applications, with a focus on Deep Learning (DL) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Thereafter, we present a series of important applications of Industrial AIoT. The key challenges associated with the implementation of Industrial AIoT applications are also discussed. In addition, the societal and economic impacts of Industrial AIoT are briefly described. Finally, we outline the future research directions in Industrial AIoT, which should be further investigated to fully utilize the potential of this innovative technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".