MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400499161 · doi:10.5114/jhi.2024.140837

Estimating the impact of availability restrictions and taxation increases on alcohol consumption, 100% alcohol-attributable and all-cause mortality in the Baltic countries and Poland 2001-2020

2024· article· en· W4400499161 on OpenAlexaff
Jürgen Rehm, Inese Gobiņa, Kinga Janik‐Koncewicz, Huan Jiang, Laura Miščikienė, Janina Petkevičienė, Ričardas Radišauskas, Rainer Reile, Mindaugas Štelemėkas, Alexander Tran, Justina Trišauskė, Witold Zatoński, Shannon Lange

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Health Inequalities · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlcohol consumptionAlcoholConsumption (sociology)Environmental healthEconomicsMedicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction:Major alcohol control policy measures in the Baltic countries and Poland have been shown to reduce alcohol per capita consumption (APC), 100% alcohol-attributable and all-cause mortality.This publication aims to estimate the effects of taxation increases and availability restrictions separately.Material and methods: Data were obtained from the statistical offices of the countries included except for alcohol consumption data, which were taken from the WHO for comparability reasons.Various types of regression analyses were conducted on time-series data using generalized additive mixed models.Results: On average, taxation increases were associated with decreases in APC (-0.89 litres (l); 95% CI: -1.35 l, -0.43 l) and all-cause mortality (-1.3%; 95% CI: -2.4%, -0.17%) among males.Given the average number of deaths in the four countries, the 1.3% reduction in the male mortality rate corresponds to 93 deaths postponed in Estonia, 166 in Latvia, 239 in Lithuania, and 2,606 in Poland, using the 2019 populations of the respective countries as the reference points.For 100% alcohol-attributable mortality, there were significant associations with availability restrictions for males (-12.1%;95% CI: -17.8%, -6.4%) and females (-8.5%; 95% CI: -16.3%, -0.7%), as well as with taxation for females (-9.06%; 95% CI: -14.02%, -3.83%).All other associations were in the hypothesized direction but did not reach statistical significance.Conclusions: Different effects were found for taxation increases and availability restrictions.The former works via reducing the level of consumption, and thereby reduces all-cause mortality, while the latter seems to work more specifically on reducing heavy drinking occasions and consequently in particular on decreasing 100% alcohol-attributable mortality.Both alcohol control policies important to reduce consumption and alcohol-attributable mortality.However, they produce partly different outcomes, and thus should be implemented depending on the epidemiological profile and the desired effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.226
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Health InequalitiesSame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207