MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400514178 · doi:10.1101/2024.07.05.602208

Airway smooth muscle tone curbs hyperresponsiveness in experimental asthma

2024· preprint· en· W4400514178 on OpenAlexafffund
Morgan Gazzola, Magali Boucher, Cyndi Henry, Andrés Rojas‐Ruiz, David Marsolais, Ynuk Bossé

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval
KeywordsAirway hyperresponsivenessAsthmaAirwayMuscle toneTone (literature)Bronchial hyperresponsivenessMedicineAudiologyInternal medicineAnesthesiaPhysical medicine and rehabilitationLungRespiratory diseaseArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background & Objectives A sustained contraction of airway smooth muscle, hereinafter called tone, increases the response to methacholine in healthy mice and humans. However, the effect of tone in the context of an active inflammation remains to be investigated. The objective of the present study was to test the effect of tone on the in vivo response to methacholine in mice during an active inflammatory phase of experimental asthma. Methods Male BALB/c mice were exposed once-daily to either intranasal saline or house dust mite for 10 consecutive days to induce experimental asthma. They then underwent one of two methacholine challenges 24 h after the last exposure. While the same cumulative dose was administered in both challenges, one was preceded by a 20-min period of tone induced by nebulizing low doses of methacholine at 5-min intervals. Respiratory mechanics were monitored before and throughout the methacholine challenge by oscillometry. Bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) and histology were also performed. Results BAL inflammation and histological alterations were consistent with experimental asthma. In accordance with previous studies, tone potentiated the response to methacholine in control mice, mainly by stiffening the lung periphery. The lung was even stiffer upon methacholine challenge during an active phase of inflammation in mice with experimental asthma, but this was not further potentiated by tone. In fact, in mice with experimental asthma, tone mitigated hyperresponsiveness by preventing further airway narrowing and, more importantly, small airway narrowing heterogeneity and closure. Conclusion During an active inflammatory phase of experimental asthma, tone protects against hyperresponsiveness. Take-home message The effect of airway smooth muscle tone on the methacholine response was investigated in mice with or without experimental asthma. While tone potentiated the methacholine response in control mice, it mitigated hyperresponsiveness in experimental asthma. These results unveiled a protective role of the airway smooth muscle in experimental asthma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicAsthma and respiratory diseases→French-language works237,207→