Networked everyday lives in the ‘care-full’ city: A framework for examining the complexities of immigrants living with dementia, carepartners, and care workers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ways in which people living with dementia (PLWD) care and are cared for in urban and suburban environments is not fully understood. Specifically, there is limited research on the impact neighborhoods have on the intersectional experiences of well-being for PLWD and their formal and informal caregivers—particularly for immigrants, women, and those living in under-resourced suburban areas. Writing from the geographical context of the inner suburb of Scarborough in Toronto, Canada, we present a framework for understanding the everyday complexities of care practices in this triad of individuals—PLWDs, care partners, and care workers—that considers their diverse practices, contexts, identities, and relations through time. Documenting these networks of caring complexities, represented in social and spatial ways, can disrupt the ways in which neoliberalism has relegated the understanding of care to be a highly gendered and racialized problem, as well as an individual problem to be solved by the free market, and to be contained in the home between family members (not in the public community realm).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".