The Cholera Epidemic in the Border Territories of the Far East in the Early 20th Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a rule, the epidemics that took place on the Russian territory in the first quarter of the 20th century were a part of the world epidemics that covered significant territories. Based on the materials of local newspapers, the reaction of the population towards current events and government actions is traced. The abundance of information and the range of periodicals which enable to trace the dynamic development of epidemics, statistics of diseases and public opinion about current events and activities is highlighted. The relevance of the topic is due, among other things, to the appeal to the socio-historical perspective of the problem of the mutual influence of power and society in extreme conditions on the example of the aggravation of epidemiological situation in the Far East during the period under review. Based on the archives introduced into scientific circulation, the management of sanitary affairs, historical aspects of the formation of the sanitary and epidemiological service, the implementation of measures to prevent and combat diseases are studied. The experience of Russian physicians in the fight against epidemics in the border territories is analyzed. From the point of view of the history of science the study of peripheral spaces having economic, cultural, strategic, and political forms is necessary for a historically reliable reconstruction of the policy of both the territory ready for epidemic challenges and the state. It is concluded that the analyzed epidemics have become a catalyst for changes in the concepts and practice of medicine, have changed the role of public health in the border areas. An important role in the fight against infectious diseases in the border territories of the Far East was played by the agitation activities of sanitary and epidemiological services, as well as sanitary, epidemiological and preventive measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".