OP-059 Lung function improvement by dupilumab associated with better asthma control in children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim The relationship between lung function improvement and patient-reported outcomes is unclear. In LIBERTY ASTHMA VOYAGE ( NCT02948959), dupilumab reduced exacerbations and improved lung function, control, and quality of life in children (aged 6 to 11 years) with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma, with an acceptable safety profile. This post hoc analysis evaluated association between lung function change and asthma control in children with type 2 asthma (baseline blood eosinophils ≥150 cells/µL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO] ≥20 ppb) in each treatment group.Material and Method 321 children were randomized 2:1 to receive add-on dupilumab 100/200 mg q2w (body-weight based) or placebo for 52 weeks. We stratified patients into low, medium, or high tertiles according to change in pre-bronchodilator percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) from baseline to Week 52. We assessed proportion and odds ratio (OR) of children achieving controlled and well-controlled asthma (Interviewer-Administered 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score [ACQ-5-IA]: <1.5 and ≤0.75, respectively) at Week 52 between tertile subgroups within each treatment arm using logistic regression models with age, weight, region, baseline eosinophils, FeNO, inhaled corticosteroid dose, baseline pre-bronchodilator ppFEV1, baseline ACQ-5-IA, and per-treatment tertile subgroups as covariates.Results Dupilumab and placebo arms showed a mean reduction from baseline in pre-bronchodilator ppFEV1 at Week 52 in the low tertile and mean improvement in both medium- and high-tertile subgroups ( table 1). Significantly greater proportions of children achieved well-controlled asthma in the dupilumab medium- and high-tertile vs low-tertile subgroup (table 1). In the placebo arm, the proportion of well-controlled asthma patients was significantly higher in the high- vs low-tertile subgroup only (table 1). Tertile subgroups were not significantly different in achievement of controlled asthma for dupilumab vs. placebo.Abstract OP-059 Table 1Achievement of controlled and well-controlled asthma by ppFEV1 change from baseline to Week 52 tertile subgroupsACQ-5-IA, Interviewer-Administered 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire; BD, bronchodilator; CI, confidence interval; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; OR, odds ratio; ppFEV1, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second; SD, standard deviation. aPatients who did not meet the criterion or had missing value are considered as non-controlled. bDerived from logistic regression model with tertiles by treatment group, age, weight, region, baseline eosinophils, FeNO, inhaled corticosteroid dose, baseline pre-bronchodilator ppFEV1 and baseline ACQ-5-IA score as covariateConclusions In children with moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma, improvements in lung function were associated with achieving well-controlled asthma within dupilumab and placebo treatment arms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".