A hybrid attention‐based long short‐term memory fast model for thermal regulation of smart residential buildings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An attention‐based long short‐term memory (ALSTM)‐fast model predictive control (MPC) thermal regulation system for buildings is presented. The proposed system is developed to address the challenges associated with traditional heating, ventilation, and cooling (HVAC) control systems, often designed with fixed setpoints and static control strategies, leading to poor performance and suboptimal energy efficiency. The ALSTM‐Fast MPC system, on the other hand, performs the integration of deep learning and optimisation algorithms to predict the thermal behaviour of buildings and optimise the HVAC system control for thermal comfort and energy efficiency. The ALSTM‐Fast MPC system was implemented and evaluated on a real‐world data collected from a building automation system. Additionally, extensive experiments were conducted to analyse the system's performance. The results demonstrated the system's adaptability to changing thermal dynamics and occupancy patterns and its ability to achieve robust and efficient thermal regulation. As a result, a solution for optimising HVAC control in buildings is provided by the proposed ALSTM‐Fast MPC system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".