Deep Hybrid Camera Deblurring for Smartphone Cameras
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile cameras, despite their significant advancements, still have difficulty in low-light imaging due to compact sensors and lenses, leading to longer exposures and motion blur. Traditional blind deconvolution methods and learning-based deblurring methods can be potential solutions to remove blur. However, achieving practical performance still remains a challenge. To address this, we propose a learning-based deblurring framework for smartphones, utilizing wide and ultra-wide cameras as a hybrid camera system. We simultaneously capture a long-exposure wide image and short-exposure burst ultra-wide images, and utilize the burst images to deblur the wide image. To fully exploit burst ultra-wide images, we present HCDeblur, a practical deblurring framework that includes novel deblurring networks, HC-DNet and HC-FNet. HC-DNet utilizes motion information extracted from burst images to deblur a wide image, and HC-FNet leverages burst images as reference images to further enhance a deblurred output. For training and evaluating the proposed method, we introduce the HCBlur dataset, which consists of synthetic and real-world datasets. Our experiments demonstrate that HCDeblur achieves state-of-the-art deblurring quality. Codes and datasets are available at https://cg.postech.ac.kr/research/HCDeblur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".