MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400579171 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3427124

Power Control of 5G-Connected Vehicular Network Using PPO-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithm

2024· article· en· W4400579171 on OpenAlexafffund
Mostafa Raeisi, A.B. Sesay

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersScience and Engineering Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer sciencePower controlTelecommunications linkTransmitter power outputPower (physics)Interference (communication)AlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)Real-time computingComputer networkArtificial intelligenceTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel power control in vehicular 5G-connected network using Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithm. We investigate power allocation for Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) on uplink connections in mm-wave bands between the CAVs and Roadside Units (RSUs). Our objective is to achieve the desired uplink transmission capacity using the minimum required power and minimize co-channel interference for neighboring cells. To achieve this goal, we use the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm implemented by modified actor-critic architecture to solve the problem. In the proposed architecture, a Deep Neural Network (DNN) model is used to gain the desired outputs of the problem. The suggested approach is fully compatible with the existing 3GPP-based 5G architecture and uses the available quantized information in cellular users’ measurement reports which provides seamless integration within existing RAN architectures. The performance of the proposed algorithm is compared with multiple power control algorithms in various road conditions. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the 3GPP-based power control algorithm in the dynamic road environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207