DAE-Net: Deforming Auto-Encoder for fine-grained shape co-segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present an unsupervised 3D shape co-segmentation method which learns a set of deformable part templates from a shape collection. To accommodate structural variations in the collection, our network composes each shape by a selected subset of template parts which are affine-transformed. To maximize the expressive power of the part templates, we introduce a per-part deformation network to enable the modeling of diverse parts with substantial geometry variations, while imposing constraints on the deformation capacity to ensure fidelity to the originally represented parts. We also propose a training scheme to effectively overcome local minima. Architecturally, our network is a branched autoencoder, with a CNN encoder taking a voxel shape as input and producing per-part transformation matrices, latent codes, and part existence scores, and the decoder outputting point occupancies to define the reconstruction loss. Our network, coined DAE-Net for Deforming Auto-Encoder, can achieve unsupervised 3D shape co-segmentation that yields fine-grained, compact, and meaningful parts that are consistent across diverse shapes. We conduct extensive experiments on the ShapeNet Part dataset, DFAUST, and an animal subset of Objaverse to show superior performance over prior methods. Code and data are available at https://github.com/czq142857/DAE-Net.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".