The generation of ROS by exposure to trihalomethanes promotes the IκBα/NF-kB/p65 complex dissociation in human lung fibroblast
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Disinfection by-products to obtain drinking water, such as CH2Cl2, CHCl3, and BrCHCl2, elicit cytotoxicity and hyperproliferation in human lung fibroblasts (MRC-5). Enzymes of their biotransformation modulate these damages and can generate toxic metabolites. However, it is unknown that the response to oxidative stress is involved in cellular hyperproliferation modulated by nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB). Hence, MRC-5 cells were treated with these compounds to evaluate ROS, lipid peroxidation, phospho-NF-κB/p65 (Ser536) levels, CAT, SOD, and GPx activities. Further, the interactions of halomethanes and ROS with IκBα/NF-κB/p65 complex were analyzed by molecular docking. The correlation among biomarkers showed positive relationships between the prooxidant damage with the antioxidant response, particularly in cells treated with CH2Cl2, and BrCHCl2. Furthermore, negative relationships among ROS with levels of NF-κB/p65 in cells treated with CH2Cl2, and CHCl3 were detected. The estimated relative free energy of binding using thermodynamic integration with the p65 subunit of NF-κB was -3.3 kcal/mol for BrCHCl2; -3.5 kcal/mol for both CHCl3 and O2•, and -3.6 kcal/mol for H2O2. The chloride and bromide are in close contact with the IPT domain residues, particularly in the RHD region involved in DNA binding. Ser281 is located in the same domain, allowing this protein's phosphorylation. Similarly, both ROS are in contact with IPT domain into region RHD and H2O2 as side-chain oxygen with Leu280, adjacent to the phosphorylation site of p65. However, a negative correlation among ROS with phospho- NF-κB/p65 suggests ROS's steric hindrance on the C-terminal domain of NF-κB/p65 is involved in antioxidant response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".