<i>p</i>‐Orbital Higher‐Order Topological Corner States in 2D Photonic Su–Schrieffer–Heeger Lattices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Higher‐order topological insulators (HOTIs) have attracted much attention in photonics partly because of the robust and highly confined corner modes they support. The growing availability of synthetic multi‐orbital platforms has recently stimulated research focus on the interplay between HOTIs and orbital degree of freedom. In this work, the topological properties of the two‐dimensional (2D) Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (SSH) model with ‐orbital degree of freedom are explored and ‐orbital topological corner states in a laser‐written photonic 2D SSH lattice are experimentally observed. It is shown that the ‐band 2D SSH model is a HOTI, where zero‐energy orbital corner states appear either as in‐gap states or as bound states in the continuum (BICs). Chiral symmetry is sufficient for topological protection of the in‐gap ‐orbital corner states, but not for their BIC counterparts because of the hybridization effect within the bulk continuum. The multipole chiral number is employed as an optimal topological invariant to characterize the ‐orbital HOTIs. The flexibility of tuning the orbital couplings offers an extra degree of manipulation for the BICs, which may be useful for the development of novel photonic devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".