Effect of Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) on Motivation of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Children with cerebral palsy (CP) may experience challenges with motivation to engage in motor activities during rehabilitation sessions, which can impact therapy outcomes. This study investigated the effect of the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) intervention on the motivation and achievement of motor-based goals in rehabilitation sessions for children with CP. In this pilot randomized trial, eighteen children aged 8–13 years with CP participated and were randomly assigned to either the CO-OP or bottom-up usual care group. The CO-OP group received 12 performance-based cognitive intervention sessions. The CO-OP intervention significantly enhanced the motivation of children with CP to engage and participate in therapeutic activities, as evidenced by the Pediatric Motivation Scale (PMOT) and its four sub-scales (p < 0.05, based on repeated measures ANOVA). Moreover, the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) T-scores were higher for both posttest and follow-up assessments in the CO-OP group compared to the bottom-up usual care group. Additionally, independent sample t-test results demonstrated a significant difference in the mean scores of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) between the two groups. The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) intervention successfully enhanced the motivation and facilitated the achievement of motor-based goals from the patient perspective in children with CP. The client-centered approach, focusing on meeting the basic psychological needs of the participants, contributed to improved therapy outcomes in terms of functional abilities, goal attainment, and engagement in daily activities. These findings highlight the potential of the CO-OP intervention as an effective approach for enhancing motivation and improving therapy outcomes in children with CP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".