Parental apologies and adolescents' information management strategies: Social learning and self-determination perspectives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adolescents' willingness to share information with their parents about their life is related to their positive adjustment. As such, it is important to identify factors that lead adolescents to share this knowledge with parents. This study takes a step in this direction by examining the role of parental apologies following parental offenses, in relation to adolescents' usage of three main information management strategies: disclosure, lying, and secrecy. Using a sample of 288 mid-to-late adolescents, we assessed parental apologies and adolescents' information management strategies at three levels (global, situational, and hypothetical), using multiple methods (correlational and experimental). Overall, results suggest that parental apologies characterized by more need-supportive elements tend to be positively associated with adolescents' disclosure, whereas those characterized by more need-thwarting elements tend to be positively associated with adolescents' lying and, to some extent, secrecy. • Adolescents' disclosure (vs. lying and secrecy) behaviors with their parents is predictive of adolescents' healthy development • Whether and how parents apologize to adolescents may teach adolescents whether and how they share information with parents • We tested this possibility at three levels (global, situational, hypothetical) using correlational and experimental designs • Overall, need-supportive parental apologies tended to be associated with greater disclosure tendencies in adolescents • Overall, need-thwarting parental apologies tended to be associated with greater lying tendencies in adolescents
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it