Deep learning-based image analysis for filamentous and floc-forming bacteria in wastewater treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In municipal wastewater treatment, effective secondary clarification relies on the balance between floc-forming bacteria and filamentous bacteria. Consequently, comprehensive and real-time monitoring of this balance will enable reliable operation of biological wastewater treatment. This research presents an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach for the classification of filamentous and floc-forming bacteria in microscopic images using deep learning. To provide ground truth labeling, an automated rule-based segmentation algorithm was developed using color and morphology criteria along with supplementary filtration steps to enhance the precision of filamentous and floc-forming bacteria identification. The segmentation algorithm demonstrated reliable detection and categorization of bacteria across varying background intensities and effectively recognized intricate microbial configurations. Subsequently, the supervised deep learning model was trained on the segmented images and constructed with an encoder/decoder architecture. Machine training with only 68 microscopic images demonstrated successful classification of the filamentous and floc-forming bacteria with a 97.8 % accuracy. In addition, qualitative evaluation demonstrated that the deep learning model could generalize machine understanding across diverse scenarios and discern misclassified filamentous bacteria accurately. The proposed model stands as a promising automated tool for real-time quantification of filamentous and floc-forming bacteria in bioreactors and clarifiers, offering the potential for reliable operation as well as immediate actions for sludge bulking and membrane fouling problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".