MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400604485 · doi:10.55037/lxlaser.21st.13

Simultaneous Two-Colour Two-Dye Thermometry PLIF And PIV To Determine The Nusselt Number In Steady And Oscillatory Poiseuille-Rayleigh-Bénard Convection

2024· article· en· W4400604485 on OpenAlexaff
Sina Kashanj, David S. Nobes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNusselt numberParticle image velocimetryMechanicsHagen–Poiseuille equationRayleigh numberNatural convectionHeat transferMaterials scienceVelocimetryRayleigh–Bénard convectionConvectionOpticsFlow (mathematics)ThermodynamicsPhysicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a flow field driven by natural or mixed convection, the measurement of heat transfer and hence the Nusselt number, requires simultaneous measurement of the vertical component of velocity and the vertical temperature gradient. The spatiotemporal nature of the formation of large-scale circulating structures, their interaction with the cross flow and its impact on heat transport, temperature distribution and wall shear stress also can be identified by simultaneous velocimetry and thermometry. An optical measurement system has been developed to apply a high sensetive ((~7 %)⁄℃) two-colour two-dye planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) and particle image velocimetry (PIV) to identify the flow and temperature organization and measure the heat transfer and wall shear stress. The system is to be used to investigate a Poiseuille-Rayleigh-Bénard convection system designed and fabricated to operate in both continuous and oscillatory conditions. The aim is to allow investigation of the influence and effect of large-scale flow structures and thermal plumes on heat and flow transport properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows→French-language works237,207→