Development of Mixed Matrix Membranes by Using NH<sub>2</sub>‐Functionalized UiO‐66 and [APTMS][AC] Ionic Liquid for the Separation of CO<sub>2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ever‐escalating CO 2 concentration in the atmosphere calls for accelerated development and deployment of carbon capture processes to reduce emissions. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs), which are fabricated by incorporating the beneficial properties of highly selective inorganic fillers into a polymer matrix, have exhibited significant progress and the ability to enhance the performance of a membrane for gas separation. In this research, an amine‐based ionic liquid (IL) [APTMS][AC] was prepared, which has greater CO 2 affinity and greater solubility due to its amine moiety. The metal–organic framework (MOF) UiO‐66 with a multidimensional crystalline structure was used as a filler due to its appropriate porosity and tunable properties, and it was functionalized with NH 2 . MOFs were further modified with an IL to prepare UiO‐66@IL and UiO‐66‐NH 2 @IL, and MMMs incorporating each MOF were fabricated with the polymer Pebax‐1657. All the prepared membranes and MOFs were characterized to predict their separation efficiency. Several characterization techniques, namely, FTIR spectroscopy, XRD, and SEM, were used to successfully synthesize UiO‐66@IL and UiO‐66‐NH 2 @IL composites and confirmed proper dispersion and excellent polymer‒filler compatibility at filler loadings ranging from 0 to 30 wt.%. The separation performances were investigated, and the results showed that the incorporation of RTIL with the highly crystalline structure and large surface area of UiO‐66 enhanced the separation efficiency of the membrane. The permeability of CO 2 for all fabricated membranes continuously increased with increasing filler concentration, wherein the permeability was comparatively high for the UiO‐66‐NH 2 MMMs. The CO 2 /CH 4 selectivity improved by 35%, 54%, and 60%, respectively, for UiO‐66@IL, UiO‐66‐NH 2 , and UiO‐66‐NH 2 @IL MMMs compared to simple UiO‐66 for CO 2 /CH 4 and by 28%, 36%, and 63%, respectively, for CO 2 /N 2 , with an increase in filler loading in the MMMs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".