MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400647761 · doi:10.12968/gasn.2024.0013

Living with inflammatory bowel disease: a modified photovoice study of adolescent mental health

2024· article· en· W4400647761 on OpenAlexaff
Olivia Pineau, Dean A. Tripp, Alexandra Kelly, Daniel J. Mulder

Bibliographic record

VenueGastrointestinal Nursing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhotovoiceInflammatory bowel diseaseMental healthDiseaseFamily medicineInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) is a chronic condition involving inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Adolescents with IBD are 4.6 times more likely to experience depression and anxiety than healthy peers. Aims: The primary purpose of this research was to understand the lived experiences of adolescents diagnosed with IBD. Methods: Adolescents aged 16–18 years were recruited to complete an online survey, followed by a photovoice component that included the collection of images and participation in an interview. Results: Thematic analysis revealed six key themes: the importance of social support networks in managing the challenges of IBD, the positive impact of maintaining a positive outlook on life, strategies for taking control of and coping with the impact of IBD, the interplay between physical pain and the psychological toll of the disease, the various limitations imposed by IBD on daily life and the challenges posed by others’ lack of awareness and understanding of the condition. Conclusions: Adolescents with IBD experience disease-related factors that impact their wellbeing. Attention to these factors from nurses, doctors, caregivers and peers can help optimise their mental health and wellbeing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastrointestinal NursingSame topicAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207