MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient Low-Power Microwave Readout Circuit in 180 nm CMOS for Wearable Electronics

2024· article· en· W4400648308 on OpenAlexaff
Dima Kilani, Mohammad H. Zarifi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSWearable computerElectronicsWearable technologyElectrical engineeringMicrowaveLow-power electronicsOptoelectronicsDiode-or circuitPower (physics)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceTransistorEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunicationsDiscrete circuitEmbedded systemVoltagePower consumption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of microwave sensors and CMOS technology contributes to the development of wearable electronics to support small form factor and low power devices. This paper presents a unique microwave readout integrated circuit incorporated with a split ring resonator (SRR), particularly designed for gas monitoring in wearable electronics. The readout circuit is composed of a cross-coupled LC oscillator and an RF-to-DC converter. The LC oscillator naturally excites the SRR at the sensor's operating frequency, eliminating the need for the bulky vector network analyzer. The RF output of the SRR is regulated to a measured DC voltage level using the RF-to-DC converter. This DC voltage can then be used to power up the ADC or digital block in the wearable electronic device. The monolithic microwave readout circuit has been designed, simulated and implemented in TSMC 180 nm CMOS, occupying an active area of 0.108 mm2and consuming a low power of 777.1 µW obtained from post-layout simulation at a supply voltage of 1.5 V. These characteristics make the microwave readout circuit suitable for integration in wearable electronics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207