MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400649122 · doi:10.3390/molecules29143311

Spin Polarization Enhances the Catalytic Activity of Monolayer MoSe2 for Oxygen Reduction Reaction

2024· article· en· W4400649122 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dan Shu, Dan Wang, Yan Wang, Li‐Ming Tang, Ke‐Qiu Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecules · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and DiabetesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCatalysisOverpotentialMonolayerSpin polarizationChemical physicsAdsorptionChemistryPhotochemistryPolarization (electrochemistry)HydrogenOxygenMaterials scienceNanotechnologyElectronPhysical chemistryPhysicsElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The key factors in achieving high energy efficiency for proton exchange membrane fuel cells are reducing overpotential and increasing the oxygen reduction rate. Based on first-principles calculations, we induce H atom adsorption on 4 × 4 × 1 monolayer MoSe2 to induce spin polarization, thereby improving the catalytic performance. In the calculation of supercells, the band unfolding method is used to address the band folding effect in doped systems. Furthermore, it is evident from analyzing the unique energy band configuration of MoSe2 that a higher valley splitting value has better catalytic effects on the oxygen reduction reaction. We believe that the symmetries of the distinct adsorption site result in different overpotentials. In addition, when an even number of hydrogen atoms is adsorbed, the monolayer MoSe2 has no spin polarization. The spin can affect the electron transfer process and alter the hybrid energy with the reaction products, thereby regulating its catalytic performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMoleculesSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207