MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400651252 · doi:10.7759/cureus.64582

Awareness of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Among the General Population of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

2024· article· en· W4400651252 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mushabab Alghamdi, Sami Alaklabi, Saud G Alshmrani, Yaser Mohammed D Alamri, Turki Alamri, Turki M Alaklabi, Sultan Saber Z Alharethi, Salem Alalyani, M. Adam

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePopulationDiseaseCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Cross-sectional studyFamily medicineComputer-assisted web interviewingQuarter (Canadian coin)Environmental healthInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PC19S) is an emerging pathological entity characterized by the development or persistence of a spectrum of symptoms and signs 12 weeks after the original disease. Most COVID-19 patients show a variety of persistent symptoms after recovery that impact their quality of life and professional performance. The prevalence of PC19S is found to be high among many populations hence, the need for knowledge and understanding of its risk factors, symptoms, and the awareness of the population about them to improve the provided health and medical care. Aim This study aims to assess the level of awareness of post-COVID-19 syndrome among the general population of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Most studies have focused on hospitalized patients and those with severe disease, but PC19S can exist in other categories of COVID-19 patients; hence, the need for total population coverage. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted during the period between June 2023 and August 2023 using a structured self-administered online questionnaire. The online questionnaire in addition to the demographic characteristics consists of two main parts, one is about the awareness of the Saudi population of symptoms of PC19S and the other is about awareness of its risk factors. Results The majority of the participants (1558; 72.4%) showed low awareness of PC19S symptoms while only about one quarter (595; 27.6%) showed satisfactory awareness. Also, the awareness of the participants toward risk factors was low, as 1738 (80.7%) of them showed low awareness. We categorized the results into three levels of awareness to simplify and facilitate interpretation. The findings showed that 1380 individuals (64.09%) had low awareness of PC19S, 536 individuals (24.89%) had moderate awareness, and only 237 individuals (11%) had high awareness. The study reported that the highest awareness toward symptoms was of smell disturbances (1206; 56.0%) and the least was of hair loss (506; 23.5%) while among the risk factors, the highest was found toward old age 1326 (61.6%) and the female sex was the lowest 194 (9.0%). Conclusion The study revealed that the majority of the participants demonstrated low awareness of symptoms and risk factors, which needs a continuous effort to raise the population's awareness of this health-threatening condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19→French-language works237,207→