Enhancing user adoption and satisfaction: A study of factors influencing CliQ payment service in the fintech market
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the factors affecting CliQ payment service adoption in Jordan as it represents a major shift in the Jordanian market to Fintech and mobile marketing. This study presented a distinctive model by integrating the “unified theory of acceptance” and the “technology acceptance model” TAM with the “use of technology UTAUT” to measure the behavioral intention of consumers and the satisfaction of the users towards utilizing the CliQ service. The study measured the linkage between four predictors (perceived usefulness, social influence, perceived ease of use, and financial risk) as well as both utilizers’ intention to CliQ service usage and utilizers’ satisfaction with using the service, along with observing the association between these predictors to determine their contribution to the users’ satisfaction mediated by the users’ intention to utilize the service mentioned above. A survey instrument was distributed to 604 respondents, and it was developed and validated by academics, as a pilot test. As well as a pre-test. Hypotheses were tested with multiple linear regression analysis using SmartPLS software to interpret path coefficients, and reliability and validity within the outer model were tested through correlation analysis. Additionally, internal consistency was explored by applying Cronbach’s alpha. The outcomes proved that the predictors significantly affect both utilizers’ behavioral attitudes and satisfaction with using the CliQ service, except for financial risk. The data analysis also indicated a significant indirect influence of all the independent variables on utilizers’ satisfaction through behavioral intention to utilize the CliQ service, except for financial risk, which had an insignificant indirect influence on utilizers’ satisfaction through behavioral intention for service usage. The findings of the current article close the gap found in the literature concerning measuring usability to enhance user satisfaction and adoption of Fintech services. Therefore, bank managers and policy planners can find insights for developing and improving mobile banking apps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".