MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400654149 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.7.006

The impact of digital marketing strategies on innovation: The mediating role of AI: A critical study of SMEs in the KSA market

2024· article· en· W4400654149 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammed Aljabari, Sulaiman Althuwaini, Asma Bouguerra, Abdel‐Aziz Ahmad Sharabati, Mahmoud Allahham, Mahmoud Allan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOrganizational and Employee Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarket intelligenceBusinessDigital marketingMarketingCustomer engagementProduct (mathematics)Process (computing)Product innovationMarketing researchMarketing strategyKnowledge managementComputer scienceSocial media

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to investigate the moderating role of digital marketing strategies on innovation through Artificial Intelligence (AI) mediating impact in Small and Medium Enterprises within Saudi Arabia. Advanced analytics tools analyzed data from KSA SMEs to establish the role of AI, customer behavior, and experiences in product and process innovation. Artificial intelligence boosts product and process innovation with unconventional customer knowledge. Integrating AI combined with digital marketing to improve decisions and efficiency, to increase understanding of customer dynamics for sustaining growth and promoting collaborations. Using AI-empowered digital marketing strengthens Saudi SMEs advancement by promptly reacting to market motions. Sustainability practices attract the environmentally conscious consumer. This research provides actionable insights for SMEs who want to employ digital marketing and AI strategies and contribute to building an economic environment in Saudi Arabia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicOrganizational and Employee PerformanceFrench-language works237,207