MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400658981 · doi:10.1364/oe.531098

Ultra-short and highly efficient metamaterial Fresnel lens-assisted taper

2024· article· en· W4400658981 on OpenAlexafffund
Leonid Pascar, Dan‐Xia Xu, Yuri Grinberg, Sunami Sajjanam Morrison, Martin Vachon, Odile Liboiron-Ladouceur

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaNational Institute for Nanotechnology
FundersNational Research Council CanadaJewish Community Foundation of MontrealMcGill University
KeywordsOpticsFresnel lensFresnel numberMetamaterialFresnel zoneFresnel equationsLens (geology)Fresnel diffractionMaterials scienceTransformation opticsPhysicsRefractive indexDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper demonstrates the benefits of leveraging free-space optics concepts in the design of certain integrated photonic components, leading to a footprint reduction without compromising on performance. Specifically, we present ultra-short, highly efficient and fabrication-friendly mode-size converters based on metamaterial Fresnel lens-assisted tapers. This is achieved using a parameterized inverse-design approach, where the metamaterial phase shifters are realized using fabrication-friendly Manhattan geometries, by optimizing the width, length, and position of the phase shifters. This approach overcomes the limitations of the conventional method that uses local periodic approximation, which is not suitable for lenses with a short focal length and high numerical aperture. We also extend the free-space concept of compound lenses and demonstrate a doublet-based taper to further reduce the footprint. The devices are fabricated and experimentally characterized in terms of insertion loss and signal integrity at high data transmission rates, exhibiting high performance. For the singlet, it effectively achieves mode-size conversion from 15 μ m to 0.5 μ m within a 15 μ m distance, leading to ×10 length reduction compared to a linear taper. The insertion loss is under 1 dB over the entire C-band. The doublet achieves the same mode-size reduction within a 10 μ m distance, leading to ×15 length reduction compared to a linear taper. The insertion loss is near 1 dB over most of the C-band. In both cases, the signal integrity is maintained for up to 50 Gbit/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207