Unlocking biological mechanisms with integrative functional genomics approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reverse genetics offers precise functional insights into genes through the targeted manipulation of gene expression followed by phenotypic assessment. While these approaches have proven effective in model organisms such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, large-scale genetic manipulations in human cells were historically unfeasible due to methodological limitations. However, recent advancements in functional genomics, particularly clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based screening technologies and next-generation sequencing platforms, have enabled pooled screening technologies that allow massively parallel, unbiased assessments of biological phenomena in human cells. This review provides a comprehensive overview of cutting-edge functional genomic screening technologies applicable to human cells, ranging from short hairpin RNA screens to modern CRISPR screens. Additionally, we explore the integration of CRISPR platforms with single-cell approaches to monitor gene expression, chromatin accessibility, epigenetic regulation, and chromatin architecture following genetic perturbations at the omics level. By offering an in-depth understanding of these genomic screening methods, this review aims to provide insights into more targeted and effective strategies for genomic research and personalized medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".