Vertical distributions of megafauna on inactive vent sulfide features correspond to their feeding modes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The discovery of inactive hydrothermal vent sulfide features near 9°50'N on the East Pacific Rise provides an opportunity to investigate the distribution and feeding ecology of communities inhabiting this type of habitat. We quantify megafaunal distributions on two features, Lucky's Mound and Sentry Spire, to determine how taxonomic composition and feeding traits vary with vertical elevation. Fifty-one morphotypes, categorized by feeding mode, were identified from three levels of the features (spire, apron, and base) and the surrounding flat oceanic rise. About half of the morphotypes (26 of 51) were only observed at the sulfide features. Passive suspension feeders were more abundant on the spires, where horizontal particulate flux is expected to be elevated, than the base or rise. Deposit feeders tended to be more abundant on the base and rise, where deposition is expected to be enhanced, but were unexpectedly abundant higher up on Sentry Spire. Community differences between the two sulfide features suggest that other processes, such as feature-specific chemoautotrophic production, may also influence distributions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".