Silylation of phosphorylated cellulosic fibers with an aminosilane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, phosphorylated cellulosic fibers were functionalized with an aminosilane ((3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane, APTES) using a simple and economical method. Several characterization were performed to determine the types of bonds between phosphorylated fibers and grafted APTES. The thermal behavior, hydrophobicity and surface charge variation as a function of pH of the multifunctional cellulose fibers were determined. Results demonstrate that APTES should proceed through Si-O-C, and possibly Si-O-P, covalent bonds with cellulose although the dimerization of silane through Si-O-Si bonds has also been observed. The terminal amino groups are expected to be partially involved in hydrogen bonds with phosphate hydroxyl groups found at phosphorylated cellulose fiber surface, causing a pulling in the configuration of the grafted APTES. The two chemical modifications proposed in this work do not significantly modify the morphology of cellulose fibers. XRD analysis also shows that the crystal structure of the phosphorylated fibers did not change after functionalization with APTES. The silylated phosphorylated fibers show potential flame-retardant properties with improved hydrophobicity. Furthermore, the functionalization of phosphorylated fibers with APTES changes the pH of zero charge point from 3.2 to 9.4 and providing a zwitterionic structure suitable for the simultaneous adsorption of both cationic and anionic species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".