EPHA1 and EPHB4 tyrosine kinase receptors regulate epithelial morphogenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Organ formation and homeostasis require the coordination of cell-cell adhesion, epithelial cell polarity and orientation of cell division to organize epithelial tissue architecture. We have previously identified proximity protein networks acting downstream of members of the EPH family of tyrosine kinase receptors and found within these networks an enrichment of components associated with cell morphogenesis and cell-cell junctions. Here, we show that two EPH receptors, EPHA1 and EPHB4, are localized to the basolateral domain of Caco-2 cells in spheroidal cultures. Depletion of either EPHA1 or EPHB4 disrupts spheroid morphogenesis, without affecting cell polarity, but via randomizing mitotic spindle orientation during cell division. Strikingly, EPHA1 and EPHB4 exert this function independently of their catalytic activity but still requiring EFN ligand binding. Consistent with this, the most abundantly expressed EPHB4 ligand in Caco-2 cells, EFNB2, is also compartmentalized at the basolateral domain in spheroids, and is required for epithelial morphogenesis. Taken together, our data reveal a new role for EPHRs in epithelial morphogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".