Supplier Relationship Management in the Age of Digital Transformation: Insights from E-commerce Businesses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This qualitative study explores Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) in the context of digital transformation within e-commerce businesses, focusing on the implications of emerging digital technologies. Through semi-structured interviews and documentary analysis, the study examines how organizations leverage technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and Internet of Things (IoT) to enhance SRM practices. Findings reveal that digitalization enables improved operational efficiencies, real-time data analytics, and expanded supplier networks through platforms such as Amazon Business and Alibaba. Strategic shifts are noted towards collaborative supplier relationships, emphasizing joint innovation, technology co-investment, and shared risk management strategies. However, the implementation of digital SRM strategies presents challenges, including data privacy concerns, integration complexities, cybersecurity threats, and regulatory compliance issues. Organizations must navigate these challenges by developing robust governance frameworks and cybersecurity protocols to protect sensitive information and ensure regulatory adherence. Key performance indicators (KPIs) such as supplier performance, cost savings, innovation impact, risk management effectiveness, and sustainability integration are critical for evaluating the success of digital SRM initiatives. Strategically, businesses are advised to prioritize leadership commitment, cross-functional collaboration, and continuous learning to optimize digital SRM practices effectively. Future research should explore emerging trends in digital SRM, investigate technological impacts on supplier dynamics and organizational performance, and examine ethical considerations in digitalization. By integrating these insights into strategic decision-making, businesses can enhance supplier relationships, mitigate operational risks, and achieve sustainable growth in the global marketplace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".