Sinusoidal control strategy applied to continuous stirred‐tank reactors: Asymptotic and exponential convergence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The main goal of this proposal is to present a class of nonlinear controllers for regulation and set point changes in continuous chemical reactors. The proposed control law has in its mathematical structure a proportional term of the regulation error to provide closed‐loop stability and a sinusoidal term, which can compensate for the nonlinearities of the plant. The closed‐loop stability of the plant is demonstrated via Lyapunov analysis, which reveals an asymptotic convergence of the control output to the required set points. Furthermore, the analysis of the regulation error's dynamic under the considered assumptions leads us to conclude that exponential stability is also reached. The controller is implemented via numerical experiments in two examples to generalize the applicability of the proposed approach by considering continuous stirred‐tank reactors models. The first case considers autocatalytic chemical oscillatory reactions that induce chaotic behaviour. For the second case, a process of acetone, butanol, and ethanol (ABE) fermentation through Clostridium acetobutylicum is considered. The proposed strategy shows an adequate performance because it can reach the required set point without long time settings and overshoot. A comparison with a smooth sliding‐mode and a standard proportional‐integral (PI) controller indicates the advantages of the proposed control approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".