Rift to Post‐Rift Tectonostratigraphy of the Sverdrup Basin in Relation to Onset of the High Arctic Large Igneous Province (HALIP) in the Early Cretaceous, Arctic Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A summary of the Jurassic‐Cretaceous rift to breakup tectonostratigraphy of the onshore Sverdrup Basin is correlated to the offshore Amerasia Basin in order to reconstruct a tectonic setting for the High Arctic Large Igneous Province (HALIP). The rift climax from the Canadian rifted margin is correlated with hyper‐extension of the continent‐ocean‐transition zone. Hyper‐extension of the continental lithosphere can accommodate plate motions of Arctic Alaska‐Chukotka away from the Canadian Arctic Islands and Lomonosov Ridge between ∼155 Ma and 135–133 Ma. After lithospheric breakup at ∼135–133 Ma, correlation of the post‐rift stage to the seafloor spreading anomalies M10n to M4n that are associated with oceanic crustal domains can accommodate plate motions from 135–133 Ma to 128 Ma. The uncertainties associated with the earliest magmas of HALIP overlap with the uncertainties on the timing of the latest seafloor spreading. The first main pulse of HALIP in the Aptian at 124–120 Ma post‐dates seafloor spreading and so HALIP was emplaced in a tectonic setting that closely resembles the present state of the south and eastern Amerasia Basin. At the paleogeographic center of the HALIP, the Alpha Ridge complex is consistent with the magmatic character and history of similar Cretaceous oceanic plateau in terms of volume and duration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".