Prevalence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency among the fulminant hepatitis A virus infection patients.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Hepatitis A is a widespread viral infection with significant public health implications. Assessing glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency in hepatitis A patients is essential for various reasons, including prognosis, disease severity evaluation, encephalopathy risk identification, tailored management, and advancing scientific understanding. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and clinical implications of G6PD impairment in individuals with fulminant hepatitis A. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive analysis was conducted, involving hospitalized patients with fulminant hepatitis A. Demographic data, prevalence rates, and clinical findings were recorded in a database. The diagnosis of hepatitis A infection was confirmed using an anti-HAV IgM antibody test, and G6PD enzyme activity was measured with a fluorescent spot assay. Results: Out of 81 patients with hepatitis A, 57 (70.4%) were males, and 24 (29.5%) were females, with an average age of 24.6 years. Dark yellow urine and anorexia were the most common clinical symptoms. Notably, 30 (37%) patients lacked G6PD. The group with G6PD deficiency showed significantly higher rates of encephalopathy and mortality (P<0.01), along with elevated bilirubin (P=0.00), abnormal coagulation parameters, and low hemoglobin levels (P=0.00). Conclusion: In light of these findings, the present study proposes the implementation of routine G6PD level assessments and the evaluation of other relevant markers in regions where hepatitis A is endemic. Furthermore, the study underscores the need for vigilant monitoring of hemolysis and encephalopathy in affected patients to optimize clinical management and reduce morbidity and mortality associated with this condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".