SUCCESSFUL MANAGEMENT OF SINO-NASAL ASPERGILLOSIS AND CANDIDIASIS IN LABRADOR RETRIEVER DOG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A nine-year-old Labrador retriever intact male dog was presented to the RVP-IVRI with an anamnesis of chronic, intermittent unilateral muco-haemorrhagic nasal discharge, swelling on the nasal region since three months.During this period, the dog was treated with various antibiotics with no success and lost 6 kg of corporal mass.Clinically, intermittent sneezing and snoring were observed.Routine hematological and biochemistry panels were within reference ranges.Radiographic findings showed space occupying mass in the nasal cavity at the level of ethmoid bone.Rhinoscopic examination was done to evaluate the nasal cavity and to help the exact diagnosis.Cytological examination revealed suppurative inflammation with secondary hemorrhages.Fungal culture from nasal swab revealed moderate growth of Aspergillusandcandidaspp after 7 days of culture.Computed tomography examination revealed polypoidal soft tissue area filling bilateral maxillary, ethmoid and frontal sinuses, partial destruction of right ethmoid bony septae and nasal septum, destruction of half of the hard palate involving alveolar process along with soft tissue density area of 44*43mm in the right cheek was also noticed which is suggestive of fungal sinusitis.Based on history, clinical examinations, diagnostic imaging and culture examinations the case was tentatively diagnosed assino-nasal aspergillosis and candidiasis.Treatment was initiated with itraconazole at the dose rate of 5 mg/kg of body weight, orally, twice a day for 21 days, enrofloxacin at 5-10 mg/kg of body weight, orally, once in a day for 7days.Significant improvement in the condition of dog was noticed after initiation of the therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".