MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400702196 · doi:10.1701/4314.42986

Sindrome del guardiano del faro: attualizzazione

2024· article· en· W4400702196 on OpenAlex
Giuseppe Fatati

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecenti Progressi in Medicina · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Obesity Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A few years ago, with the expression "lighthouse keeper syndrome", we identified those who showed exceptional attention to the control of eating and body weight. Recently the same term was used to describe, at the end of the lockdown, the feeling of living with fear the encounter with external reality, which for many weeks remained confined outside our homes. We are of the opinion that the lighthouse keeper syndrome includes all those behaviors characterized by voluntary, even if often unconscious, social isolation and by the exasperated search for absolute dominion over a single aspect of our being. There are two types of social isolation, the static one typical of those who spend their time closed at home (hikikomori) and the dynamic one characteristic of those who go out, walk but do not interact with other individuals. The radicalization of some food trends can lead to convivial group social isolation. The changes in the characteristic clinical manifestations of lighthouse keeper syndrome demonstrate the impact of society and culture on the individual psychopathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it