MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400720397 · doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2024.07.007

Completeness of revascularization by FFRCT in stable angina: Association to adverse cardiovascular outcomes

2024· article· en· W4400720397 on OpenAlexaff
Kristian Tækker Madsen, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Kristian Altern Øvrehus, Jesper Møller Jensen, Erik Thorlund Parner, Erik Lerkevang Grove, Martin Bødtker Mortensen, Nadia Iraqi, Timothy Fairbairn, Koen Nieman, Manesh R. Patel, Campbell Rogers, Sarah Mullen, Hans Mickley, Kristian Korsgaard Thomsen, Hans Erik Bøtker, Jonathon Leipsic, Niels Peter Rønnow Sand

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of cardiovascular computed tomography · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaProvidence Health Care
FundersNovo Nordisk Fonden
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineRevascularizationCardiologyStable anginaAnginaAdverse effectCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The prognostic impact of complete coronary revascularization relative to non-invasive testing methods is unknown. Objectives To assess the association between completeness of revascularization defined by CTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable angina. Methods Multicenter 3-year follow-up study of patients with new onset stable angina and ≥ 30% stenosis by CTA. The lesion-specific FFR CT value (two cm-distal-to-stenosis) was registered in all vessels with stenosis and considered abnormal when ≤ 0.80. Patients with FFR CT ≤ 0.80 were categorized as: Completely revascularized (CR-FFR CT ), all vessels with FFR CT ≤ 0.80 revascularized; incompletely revascularized (IR-FFR CT ), ≥ 1 vessels with FFR CT ≤ 0.80 non-revascularized. Early revascularization (< 90 days from index CTA) categorized vessels as revascularized. The primary endpoint comprised cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction; the secondary endpoint vessel-specific late revascularization and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Results Amongst 900 patients and 1759 vessels, FFR CT was ≤ 0.80 in 377 (42%) patients, 536 (30%) vessels; revascularization was performed in 244 (27%) patients, 340 (19%) vessels. Risk of the primary endpoint was higher for IR-FFR CT (15/210 [7.1%]) compared to CR-FFR CT (4/167 [2.4%]), RR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.01–8.8, p ​= ​0.036, and to normal FFR CT (3/523 [0.6%]), RR: 12.45; 95% CI: 3.6–42.6, p ​< ​0.001. Incidence of the secondary endpoint was higher in non-revascularized vessels with FFR CT ≤ 0.80 (29/250 [12%]) compared to revascularized vessels with FFR CT ≤ 0.80 (5/286 [1.7%]), p ​= ​0.001, and to vessels with FFR CT > 0.80 (10/1223 [0.8%]), p ​< ​0.001. Conclusion Incomplete revascularization of patients with lesion-specific FFR CT ≤ 0.80 is associated to unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes compared to those with complete revascularization or FFR CT > 0.80.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of cardiovascular computed tomographySame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207