MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400724898 · doi:10.11110/kjpt.2024.54.2.121

The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Viola labradorica (Violaceae)

2024· article· en· W4400724898 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ah-reum Go, Ki‐Oug Yoo

Bibliographic record

VenueKorean Journal of Plant Taxonomy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Structural Characterization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsViolaceaeBiologyPhylogenetic treeViolaCladeChloroplast DNAMonophylyGenomeGenusBotanyEvolutionary biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Viola labradorica is commonly known as Alpine violet, American dog violet, Dog violet, and Labrador violet. This species is distributed throughout eastern Canada and North America. In the present study, we sequenced the chloroplast genome of V. labradorica for the first time and performed a phylogenetic analysis of the genus Viola. The length of the chloroplast genome of V. labradorica was 158,751 bp. A large single-copy region (87,211 bp), a small single-copy region (17,344 bp), and two inverted repeat regions (27,098 bp each) were identified. A phylogenetic analysis was conducted using 77 protein-coding genes from the chloroplast genomes of 34 Viola. Salix koriyanagi (Salicaceae) was used as an outgroup. The genus Viola forms a monophyletic clade. Among the clades for the genus Viola, the sect. Viola formed a clade and was divided into two subclades: subsect. Viola and subsect. Rostratae. Within the subsect. Rostratae, V. labradorica was placed in a basal position. These results contribute to a clear identification of the phylogenetic position of V. labradorica in the subsect. Rostratae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKorean Journal of Plant TaxonomySame topicBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207