MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Age-Aware Edge Caching and Multicast Scheduling Using Deep Reinforcement Learning

2024· article· en· W4400728071 on OpenAlexaff
Seyedeh Bahereh Hassanpour, Ahmad Khonsari, Masoumeh Moradian, Aresh Dadlani, Galymzhan Nauryzbayev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticastComputer scienceReinforcement learningScheduling (production processes)Computer networkXcastEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temporal nature of data in Internet of Things (IoT) networks necessitates periodic updates of cached content at edge devices, while multicasting dynamic content can enhance network efficiency. This paper addresses the challenge of joint cache updating and multicast scheduling in a cache-enabled, queue-equipped small base station (SBS) with limited cache capacity, which accesses a macro base station (MBS) to download (update) uncached (cached) content and serves requests through multicasting. We formulate a two-stage optimization problem to minimize the average age of information (AAoI) per request, subject to constrained average queueing delay and access rate. The first stage employs the Lyapunov drift-plus-penalty method at the SBS to schedule multicasting and downloading (updating) uncached (cached) content. The second stage, implemented at the MBS, leverages deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to determine the content replacement policy. Simulation results show that the DRL-based cache replacement policy yields up to 50%, 59%, and 60% improvements in AAoI compared to the maximum age, least-recently-used, and least-frequently-used baseline policies, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207