A preliminary investigation of sex differences in cognitive and fMRI changes following 28 days of cannabis abstinence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have investigated the influence of cannabis on cognition among people with MS (pwMS), yet the influence of sex in the context of cannabis use remains unexplored. We aim to fill this gap by investigating cannabis-sex related differences in verbal learning, memory and processing speed in association with fMRI (resting state, and task-based) metrics. METHOD: Our sample consisted of 19 long-term, frequent cannabis users (8 males, 11 females). Assessments were conducted at baseline and after 28 days of cannabis abstinence. The tests included measures of verbal memory (Selective Reminding Test (SRT)), working memory (n-back), information processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)) and the resting state DMN. To evaluate the effects of cannabis abstinence, we performed a group x time interaction analysis using repeated measures ANCOVA. This analysis controlled for several covariates, including the level of disability (EDSS), baseline cannabis THC metabolite levels, and cannabis withdrawal symptoms. By controlling for these variables, we aimed to isolate the impact of cannabis abstinence on cognitive performance over time. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: There were no baseline cognitive differences between the sexes. After 28 days of cannabis abstinence, females performed better on the Selective Reminding Test (SRT) (p = 0.04), with a large effect size (η² = 0.286). The mean correct response improved over time for females, but there was no statistically significant group x time interaction on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the n-back task. Resting state default mode network data showed overall increased activation in females relative to males at day 28, which meshed with lower brain activation during task-based fMRI paradigms. CONCLUSION: Cannabis negated sex-based cognitive differences. Functional MRI task-based paradigms revealed less cerebral activation in females compared to males, which was associated with comparable or better cognitive performance in females, particularly after cannabis abstinence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".