A three-dimensional lattice-free agent-based model of intracellular ice formation and propagation and intercellular mechanics in liver tissues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A successful cryopreservation of tissues and organs is crucial for medical procedures and drug development acceleration. However, there are only a few instances of successful tissue cryopreservation. One of the main obstacles to successful cryopreservation is intracellular ice damage. Understanding how ice spreads can accelerate protocol development and enable model-based decision-making. Previous models of intracellular ice formation in individual cells have been extended to one-cell-wide arrays to establish the theory of intercellular ice propagation in tissues. The current lattice-based ice propagation models do not account for intercellular forces resulting from cell solidification, which could lead to mechanical disruption of tissue structures during freezing. Moreover, these models have not been expanded to include more realistic tissue architectures. In this article, we discuss the development and validation of a stochastic model for the formation and propagation of ice in small tissues using lattice-free agent-based model. We have improved the existing model by incorporating the mechanical effects of water crystallization within cells. Using information from previous research, we have also created a new model that accounts for ice growth in tissue slabs, spheroids and hepatocyte discs. Our model demonstrates that individual cell freezing can have mechanical consequences and is consistent with earlier findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".