MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400745574 · doi:10.1002/admi.202400328

Fluctuating Flame from Suspending Ferrimagnetic Core/Shell Al@Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Nanoparticles in a Magnetic Field

2024· article· en· W4400745574 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials Interfaces · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergetic Materials and Combustion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceFerrimagnetismNanocompositeNanoparticleCombustionX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyIron oxideChemical engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Magnetic fieldNanotechnologyMagnetizationPhysical chemistryMetallurgyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Core–shell fuel@oxidizer nanocomposite can combust in oxygen‐starved environment. A ferrimagnetic reactive particle, being successfully engineered, allows for manipulation using an external magnetic field and facilitates target heat or gas production. This research reports on interesting flame dynamics of newly synthesized core–shell Al@Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles under the influence of a magnetic field. Serving as an oxidizer and a functional ferrimagnetic component, iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) are grown in situ on nano‐sized Al (n‐Al) particles. Electron microscopic images demonstrate nearly monodispersed IONPs ≈7 nm decorating the surface of n‐Al. X‐ray diffractogram and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirm the formation of Fe 3 O 4 . Thermal analysis suggests the as‐prepared core–shell particles predominantly go through a solid‐state reaction mechanism that exhibits 30% lower activation energy compared to physically‐mixed nanocomposite (215.0 vs 310.8 kJ mol −1 ). The core/shell particles can be ignited and combust under laser irradiation with or without the effect of a magnetic field. When suspended in the middle of the tube by the magnetic field, an interesting combustion process is observed, highlighting a grow‐shrink‐grow flame resulted from the interactions between the combustion products and the external magnetic field, as well as backfiring at the bottom of the sample without major changes in burning rate and ignition delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it