Visual system structural and functional connections during face viewing in body dysmorphic disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Individuals with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) perceive distortions in their appearance, which could be due to imbalances in global and local visual processing. The vertical occipital fasciculus connects dorsal and ventral visual stream regions, integrating global and local information, yet the role of this structural connection in BDD has not been explored. Here, we investigated the vertical occipital fasciculus's white matter microstructure in those with BDD and healthy controls and tested associations with psychometric measures and effective connectivity while viewing their face during fMRI. Methods: We analyzed diffusion MRI and fMRI data in 17 unmedicated adults with BDD and 21 healthy controls. For diffusion MRI, bundle-specific analysis was performed, enabling quantitative estimation of neurite density and orientation dispersion of the vertical occipital fasciculus. For task fMRI, participants naturalistically viewed photos of their own face, from which we computed effective connectivity from dorsal to ventral visual regions. Results: In BDD, neurite density was negatively correlated with appearance dissatisfaction and negatively correlated with effective connectivity. Further, those with weaker effective connectivity while viewing their face had worse BDD symptoms and worse insight. In controls, no significant relationships were found between any of the measures. There were no significant group differences in neurite density or orientation dispersion. Conclusion: Those with BDD with worse appearance dissatisfaction have a lower fraction of tissue having axons or dendrites along the vertical occipital fasciculus bundle, possibly reflecting impacting the degree of integration of global and local visual information between the dorsal and ventral visual streams. These results provide early insights into how the vertical occipital fasciculus's microstructure relates to the subjective experience of one's appearance, as well as the possibility of distinct functional-structural relationships in BDD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".