Chart Review and Practical Recommendations for the Use of Methadone as an Alternative to Opioid Rotation in the Management of Cancer-Related Pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Palliative care, with a focus on enhancing the quality of life for individuals facing life-limiting illnesses, relies on effective pain management as a fundamental component. Opioids, particularly methadone, play a crucial role in addressing moderate to severe pain in palliative care due to their unique pharmacological properties. Methadone, a long-acting opioid agonist and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, is valuable for treating both nociceptive and neuropathic pain. However, the transition to methadone from other opioids requires careful consideration. Objectives This study examines the use of methadone as an alternative to morphine or fentanyl for managing refractory cancer pain in a tertiary care hospital in India. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of anonymized medical records of cancer patients initiated on oral methadone for pain management at a tertiary cancer center's palliative medicine outpatient clinic from February 2020 to June 2021. Data included demographic characteristics, pain descriptions, concurrent analgesic use, reasons for transitioning to methadone, rotation methods, methadone dosages, clinical outcomes, adverse effects, and treatment discontinuations. Patients were routinely followed up, with pain scores, morphine equivalent daily doses, and methadone requirements recorded at each visit. Results Forty-four patients received methadone, either as a coanalgesic (41/44) or primary opioid (3/44). Refractory cancer pain, with a neuropathic component, was the predominant indication for methadone use. Following the methadone initiation, all patients experienced significant pain relief. Median daily methadone dose increased from 5 to 7.5 mg after 1 week. Adverse effects were minimal, with one patient experiencing QTc interval prolongation. Patient-specific factors often necessitated deviations from equianalgesic conversion tables in determining methadone dosages. Conclusion Methadone offers a viable option for refractory cancer pain when conventional treatments fall short. Physicians should prioritize personalized titration and thorough assessment during opioid rotation, rather than relying solely on conversion tables. Further research is needed to explore alternative approaches for opioid rotation and to expand our understanding of methadone's optimal use in cancer pain management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".