A sustainable environment requires sustainable water—a review of some water issues to learn from
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Water sustainability has become one of the most severe issues in the 21st century due to urban population growth and climate change. This paper reviews some of the critical key water issues that need to be considered in the quest for water sustainability for the upcoming decades. The purpose is to recognize the critical circumstances for maintaining water sustainability and send warning signals for regions that have passed the “tipping point” of balancing their water sustainability, while failing to realize restoring sustainability will be extremely difficult. Examples are used to demonstrate situations which, in hindsight, have been initially shown to be effective but highly problematic in the long term. This review considers, amongst others, the example of 1960s India, which shows that an agricultural “success” that started in the 1960s has subsequently become an environmental disaster. Additional issues, including the impacts of dietary adjustments, upstream diversions raising downstream shortfalls, and water transfers from agriculture to urban areas, are used as examples. They demonstrate that lessons must be learned from the past to achieve water sustainability, and adaptive measures must be adopted to help humanity avoid irreversible environmental tragedies. This paper highlights the urgent need for policymakers and stakeholders to proactively promote better water resource management strategies, domestic/international collaborations, and strict water use practice regulations, all of which will contribute to water sustainability and management plans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".