Hydrogen-Bonding and Hydrophobic Interaction Networks as Structural Determinants of Microbial Rhodopsin Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microbial pump rhodopsins are highly versatile light-driven membrane proteins that couple protein conformational dynamics with ion translocation across the cell membranes. Understanding how microbial pump rhodopsins use specific amino acid residues at key functional sites to control ion selectivity and ion pumping direction is of general interest for membrane transporters, and could guide site-directed mutagenesis for optogenetics applications. To enable direct comparisons between proteins with different sequences we implement, for the first time, a unique n umbering s cheme for the m icrobial pump rho dopsin residues, NS-mrho . We use NS-mrho to show that distinct microbial pump rhodopsins typically have hydrogen-bond networks that are less conserved than anticipated from the amino acid residue conservation, whereas their hydrophobic interaction networks are largely conserved. To illustrate the role of the hydrogen-bond networks as structural elements that determine the functionality of microbial pump rhodopsins, we performed experiments, atomic-level simulations, and hydrogen bond network analyses on GR, the outward proton pump from Gloeobacter violaceus, and KR2, the outward sodium pump from Krokinobacter eikastus . The experiments indicate that multiple mutations that recover KR2 amino acid residues in GR not only fail to convert it into a sodium pump, but completely inactivate GR by abolishing photoisomerization of the retinal chromophore. This observation could be attributed to the drastically altered hydrogen-bond interaction network identified with simulations and network analyses. Taken together, our findings suggest that functional specificity could be encoded in the collective hydrogen-bond network of microbial pump rhodopsins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".