<i>XeroPol</i>: Emotion-Aware Contrastive Learning for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Politeness Identification in Dialogues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Politeness is key to successful conversations. It depicts the behavior that is socially valued and is often accompanied by emotions. Previously, researchers have focused on detecting politeness in goal-oriented conversations in high-resource English language. The existing studies do not focus on identifying politeness in a resource-scared Indian languages such as Hindi, primarily due to the lack of labeled data. To overcome this limitation, in this article, we propose a novel emotion-aware contrastive learning (CL) method for zero-shot cross-lingual politeness identification (XeroPol) task in dialogues. We introduceContrastiveAligner, a CL-based alignment method for zero-shot cross-lingual transfer.ContrastiveAligneremploys translated data and pushes the model to generate similar utterance embeddings for different languages. As politeness and emotion are interrelated, hence, as the conversation progresses, the variation in emotions tends to pose challenges in identifying politeness in dialogues. Thus, in this work, we also design an auxiliary emotion-aware CL objective using sentiment information, namely theEmoSenti objective, which is expected to implicitly model the emotion change across utterances and help in the primary task of politeness identification. Experiments on MultiDoGo and EmoWOZ datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly outperforms the baselines. Further analysis such as human evaluation on the EmoInHindi dataset validates the efficacy of the entire approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".