Проблема раздела Палестины в контексте дипломатической деятельности Лестера Пирсона
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2018, Israel celebrates the 70th anniversary of independence. The Arab‑Israeli confrontation continues during this period. Resolution 181 of the UN General Assembly, adopted in 1947, implied a plan for dividing the mandated territories of Palestine into two independent states: Jewish and Arab. The division has grown into a large‑scale Middle East conflict, and the Palestinian issue today is one of the most acute and debated in the international community.The Canadian government, which has established itself as an influential mediator in resolving international disputes, has contributed to the attempts to resolve this conflict.The article analyzes Canada’s policy on the Palestinian issue before the formation of the State of Israel, and also assesses Canada’s role in developing a plan for dividing Palestine into the United Nations.The article considers the participation of the famous Canadian diplomat Lester Pearson in deciding the fate of Palestine, which was one of the first appearances of Canada as an independent actor in international relations. В 2018 г. Израиль отметил 70‑летие своей независимости. На протяжении всего этого периода продолжается арабо‑израильское противостояние. Резолюция № 181 Генеральной Ассамблеи ООН, принятая в 1947 г., подразумевала план раздела подмандатных территорий Палестины на два независимых государства: еврейского и арабского. Разделение переросло в масштабный ближневосточный конфликт, а палестинский вопрос по сей день является одним из самых острых и обсуждаемых в международном сообществе. Канадское правительство, зарекомендовавшее себя как влиятельного посредника в решении международных споров, внесло свой вклад в попытки урегулирования конфликта. В статье проанализирована политика Канады в отношении палестинского вопроса до образования государства Израиль. Оценена роль знаменитого канадского дипломата Лестера Пирсона в разработке плана раздела Палестины, который стал одним из первых «выходов в свет» Канады в качестве самостоятельного актора международных отношений.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".