Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a 1:1 Mixture of Doxecitine and Doxribtimine: Open-label Phase 1 Single Ascending Dose and Food Effect Studies in Healthy Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose Doxecitine (deoxycytidine [dC]) and doxribtimine (deoxythymidine [dT]) powder for oral solution is a 1:1 mixture consisting of equal weights 2'-deoxycytidine (dC) and 2'-deoxythymidine (dT). Doxecitine and doxribtimine (referred to as study drug) is being developed as treatment for people with thymidine kinase 2 deficiency (TK2d). TK2d is an ultra-rare mitochondrial DNA depletion and multiple deletion syndrome characterized by progressive muscle weakness and premature death. Here, we report the pharmacokinetics (PK), the effect of food, and the tolerability of 2 study drug formulations, evaluated in 2 studies (Study MT-1621-103 and Study MT-1621-105). Methods A sequential, ascending 1:1 dose ratio was used for both studies (n = 14 healthy volunteer adult participants/study). After a 28-day (Study MT-1621-103) or 35-day (Study MT-1621-105) screening period, participants fasted overnight and sequentially received 86.6, 173.4, and 266.6 mg/kg study drug with a 48-hour PK assessment period and 48-hour washout period between doses. After 48 additional hours, participants were fed a high-fat meal and received 266.6 mg/kg study drug. Plasma and urine were collected before dosing and throughout the 48-hour PK period. dC and dT concentrations were analyzed by validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry methods. Safety was evaluated throughout the study and at 2-week follow-up. Findings Plasma levels of dC and dT increased rapidly and dose-dependently above endogenous levels for both formulations, with a median T max of 1 to 2 hours under fasting conditions. Post-dose plasma dC and dT concentrations declined to nearly pre-dose (baseline) concentrations after 8 to 12 hours, suggesting rapid elimination. Peak and extent of plasma exposure (baseline-corrected C max and AUC 0-t ) tended to increase less than dose-proportionally for plasma dC and greater than dose-proportionally for plasma dT. PK variability of dC and dT was moderate-to-high (>30%). Administration with food delayed T max to a median of 2 to 4 hours and increased plasma exposure: baseline-corrected plasma dC C max and AUC 0-t increased by ∼79% to 96% and 137% to 250%, respectively, and dT C max and AUC 0-t increased by 27% to 29% and 74% to 89%, respectively, indicating a significant food effect. Renal clearance played a minor role in the elimination of systemically available intact dC and dT (F e <0.3%). The study drug was generally well tolerated; most frequent study-drug–related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (n = 4/29, 14%) and dizziness (n = 3/29, 10%). Most AEs were mild-to-moderate in severity. Implications Doxecitine and doxribtimine are orally bioavailable in the intended clinical dose range. The PK profile supports a formulation consisting of equal doses of doxecitine and doxribtimine, a 3-times-daily dosing regimen, and administration with food.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".