Prevalence and Risk Factors of Cerebral Microbleeds among Egyptian Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are markers of underlying hemorrhage-prone cerebral small vessel disease detected on MRI. They are associated with a heightened risk of stroke and cognitive decline. The prevalence of CMBs among Egyptian patients with ischemic stroke is not well studied. Our aim was to detect the prevalence of CMBs and associated risk factors among Egyptian patients with ischemic stroke. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, single-center study of consecutive patients with ischemic stroke. Patients were recruited between January 2021 and January 2022 at the Assiut University Hospital in the south of Egypt. Patients with known bleeding diathesis were excluded. All participants underwent full neurological assessment, urgent laboratory investigations, and MRI with T2* sequence. RESULTS: The study included 404 patients, 191 (47.3%) of them were females. The mean age of the study population was 61 ± 1 years, and the mean NIHSS on admission was 12 ± 5. The prevalence of CMB was 26.5%, of whom 6.5% were young adults (age ≤45 years). CMBs were detected in 34.6% of patients with stroke caused by large artery atherosclerosis, 28.0% with small vessel disease stroke subtype, 25.2% with stroke of undetermined cause, and in 12.1% with cardioembolic stroke. History of AF, hypertension, dyslipidemia, Fazekas score >2, dual antiplatelet use, combined antiplatelet with anticoagulant treatment, and thrombolytic therapy remained independently associated with CMBs following multivariable regression analyses. CONCLUSION: The high number of identified CMBs needs to inform subsequent therapeutic management of these patients. We are unable to determine whether the association between CMBs and antithrombotic use is a causal relationship or rather confounded by indication for these treatments in our observational study. To understand more about the underlying cause of this finding, more studies are needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".