MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400811334 · doi:10.1109/csci62032.2023.00209

3Describe-Creating Tangible AR (Augmented Reality) Objects Using Depth Camera

2023· article· en· W4400811334 on OpenAlex
Kevin Zhang, Mike Tianci Ye, Chris Cheng Zhang, Rongdi Ni, Yitong Liu, Anqi Xing

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAugmented Reality Applications
Canadian institutionsPositive Living NorthUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAugmented realityComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)Mixed realityComputer visionHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition from in-person to online classes, accelerated by the global impact of Covid-19, has brought both accessibility and disengagement challenges. While online platforms facilitate learning for distant and international students, the loss of interactive elements diminishes the overall educational experience. This article proposes a novel solution inspired by MIT Professor Dr. Patrick Winston's concept of using “props” to enhance learning. Leveraging augmented reality (AR) technology, an application can be developed to introduce tangible AR elements into the online learning environment. The design and methodology outline the use of Python libraries, including OpenCV and Mediapipe, along with the Intel RealSense D435 depth camera. By employing hand-tracking techniques, real-world coordinates are deduced, allowing the creation of interactive AR objects. Trigonometry is utilized to convert 3D coordinates into 2D projections on the video screen, ensuring accurate representation. The visual perception of depth is achieved by subdividing lines, allowing for the dynamic interaction of virtual objects and real hands. The results and analysis section showcases the functionality of the developed application. A 3D cube or prism appears on-screen, responding to touch and rotation gestures. The collision detection algorithm, assuming a spherical bounding box, determines whether the cube is touched, altering its color and position accordingly. Limitations, such as the imprecise collision area for elongated shapes and potential aliasing issues, are discussed as sources of error. Looking forward, the discussion section explores future enhancements and applications. Incorporating advanced modeling tools like OpenGL or Wavefront could introduce more complex 3D models. Interactive features such as hand gestures for rotation or grabbing could further enrich the online learning experience. This project serves as a foundation for the development of interactive and engaging online learning methods, bridging the gap between physical and virtual educational environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAugmented Reality ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207